Investigation on the Aerodynamic Drag Reduction of the Frontal Projection of a Car using Finite Volume Method

Authors

  • Nur Hafizah Habideen Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Permatang Pauh, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.
  • Lyeonis Stanley Victor Stanley School of Engineering, INTI International College Penang, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Tajul Afiq Tajul Arus School of Engineering, INTI International College Penang, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Mohd Faiz Osrin School of Engineering, INTI International College Penang, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Mahfuzah Zainudin Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Permatang Pauh, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24191/jaeds.v6i1.170

Keywords:

Aerodynamic drag; CFD; Finite Volume Method; Windshield angle; Vehicle aerodynamics

Abstract

Aerodynamic drag significantly influences vehicle fuel efficiency and energy consumption, particularly at highway operating conditions. While full three-dimensional (3D) simulations are widely employed in automotive aerodynamics, computationally efficient two-dimensional (2D) approaches remain valuable for early-stage design screening. This study investigates the influence of windshield inclination angle on aerodynamic drag characteristics of four simplified vehicle profiles, namely MPV, Hatchback, Sedan, and Sports car configurations, using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) based on the Finite Volume Method (FVM). The models were developed in CATIA V5R20 and simulated using ANSYS Fluent with Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations employing the standard k–ε turbulence model. The MPV served as the datum model for comparative analysis. Results demonstrate a clear inverse relationship between windshield angle and drag coefficient, where the Sports car configuration achieved the lowest drag coefficient compared to the MPV model. Flow visualization through pressure contours and velocity streamlines confirms improved flow attachment and reduced wake formation for lower windshield angles. Although absolute drag values differ from real 3D vehicle data due to geometric simplifications, the trend agrees with established aerodynamic principles reported in literature. The findings highlight the importance of frontal geometry optimization in early-stage automotive design and validate the applicability of CFD screening for comparative aerodynamic assessment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hucho, W. H. Aerodynamics of Road Vehicles (4th ed.). SAE International. 1998.

Shivam Agarwal, “Aerodynamics of Vehicles,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 1996-2001, 2020.

A, Gurusamy & Ashok, Bragadeshwaran & Mason, Byron. Prediction of Electric Vehicle Driving Range and Performance Characteristics: A Review on Analytical Modeling Strategies With Its Influential Factors and Improvisation Techniques, 2023.

Katz, J. Race Car Aerodynamics: Designing for Speed. Bentley Publishers. 1996.

Essaghouri, Abdellah & Wang, Bo. “CFD analysis on effect of front windshield angle on aerodynamic drag,” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 231, 2017.

M. Syafiq, “Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Aerodynamic Characteristics on Overtaking Vehicles in Crosswind Conditions”, Int. J. Automot. Mech. Eng., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 12373–12387, 2025.

M. Z. Mohd Zin, “Simulation The Effect of Spoiler on Aerodynamic for Sedan Car”, Peat, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 691–699, 2022.

Saleh, Zahraa & Hamid, Anmar. “Numerical Investigation of Drag Reduction Techniques in a Car Model,” IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 671, 2020.

Morel, T., “Aerodynamic Drag of Bluff Body Shapes Characteristic of Hatch-Back Cars,” SAE Technical Paper, 1978.

Versteeg, H. K., & Malalasekera, W. “An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics”, The Finite Volume Method (2nd ed.). Pearson Education. 2007.

Madha, Jowad & Nawar, Anika & Rahman, Md. Automotive Aerodynamic Drag and Lift Analysis using Computational Fluid Dynamics Software. 2023

Moukalled, F., Mangani, L., & Darwish, M. “The Finite Volume Method in Computational Fluid”, Dynamics. Springer. 2016

Dourmashkin, P. Classical Mechanics. 2022.

Alciatore and Anderson. McGraw-Hill Series In Mechanical Engineering Anderson: Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Basics with Applications. 2006

Gur, O., Mason, W.H., and Schetz, J.A. “Full-Configuration Drag Estimation”. Journal of Aircraft, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1356–1367, 2010.

Brooks, R.R. “Soft Computing Techniques”. Distributed Sensor Networks, pp. 321–333. 2024

Yusof, S.N.A., Asako, Y., Sidik, N.A.C., Mohamed, S.B., and Japar, W.M.A.A. “A Short Review on Rans Turbulence Models”, CFD Letters, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 83–96, 2020.

White, F. M. Fluid Mechanics (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill. 2011.

Autoevolution (2021) Perodua Alza Specs & Photos - 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 - Autoevolution [Online]. Available: <https://www.autoevolution.com/cars/perodua-alza-2009.html#aeng_perodua-alza-2009-15l-4at-103-hp>

Downloads

Published

2026-05-05

How to Cite

Habideen, N. H., Victor Stanley, L. S., Tajul Arus, T. A., Osrin, M. F., & Zainudin, M. (2026). Investigation on the Aerodynamic Drag Reduction of the Frontal Projection of a Car using Finite Volume Method . Journal of Applied Engineering Design and Simulation, 6(1), 165-172. https://doi.org/10.24191/jaeds.v6i1.170